Despite their popularity, there were some disadvantages to the cage crinolines. After their introduction, they became wider and wider. It became difficult for women to use public transportation or fit into carriages. Furniture could be knocked over with the sweep of skirts and doorways were often difficult to negotiate. Seating at parties had to be altered, since women needed additional room for their skirts. The plain wire cage crinolines could catch on carriages or other protrusions and cause the wearer to fall. Women who worked in china and glass factories caused problems when their wide skirts caused items to be swept from the shelves and be broken. A pottery in England lost inventory worth 200 pounds in one year. Fire was also a great danger. Since some dress fabrics were highly flammable, the wide skirts could brush a fire grate and easily catch fire. The openwork of the crinoline made it impossible to wrap the victim in order to extinguish the flames. Many magazines gave warnings to the wearer of crinolines about fires.
The hoops or cage crinolines were made from many different materials. Watchspring steel, whalebone, or metal ribs were held in place by fabric tapes. Some were just skeleton frames and others were full petticoats with the circular ribs held in place by casings. There was one record of inflatable rubber tubes used to hold the shape of the crinoline. In 1856 there was a patent of a crinoline that was inflated by means of a bellows and in order for the woman to sit down, she had to deflate it, and reinflate it with the bellows when she stood up. Another style employed gutta-percha which covered the rings so that the hoops were washable and did not rust when the rings got wet.
Not only upper and middle class women wore hoops: ladies' maids, shop girls and women working in factories wore hoops as did women working in fields. There is also documentation of women wearing crinolines mountain climbing. According to C. Willet and Phillis Cunnington in The History of Underclothes, 1859 Sheffield (a steel factory) produced wire for half a million crinolines each week. Since they were mass produced, the hoops were inexpensive. Peterson's published an advertisement for hoops in 1861 and the price ranged from 50 cents to $2.00. (In 1991 dollars that would be $7.69 to $30.75.) Children's crinolines cost between $ .19 to $1.00 ($2.92 to $15.37 in 1991 dollars).
There was much opposition to women wearing crinolines by men. According to Keri Geiger in The Civil War Lady, volume I, Number 1, the hoop kept men at a distance despite the flexibility of the skirts. Punch, an English publication constantly criticized the wearing of crinolines. Both women wearing hoops and the hoops themselves were the subject of many exaggerated cartoons and jokes. Even though men did not seem to like the crinolines, but were not above enjoying the sight of ladies' ankles or provocative stockings or petticoats.
In doing research for this article I found many items on hoops, their advantages and disavantages. I found many cartoons mocking the hoop both in Harper's New Monthly Magazine and Graham's Illustrated Magazine. Graham's had a monthly column on hoops for several months in 1857. There were articles announcing the demise of the hoop, but it remained fashionable for almost ten years longer. There were stories of why the hoop should not be worn and articles extoling the virtures of the hoop. I found a song excerpted from an October, 1857 Graham's Illustrated Magazine (It was also in the August, 1857 Harper's New Montly Magazine.). It seems to sum up a description and attitude of crinolines.
|
Sailing down the crowded street, Scraping every thing they meet, With a rushing whirlwind sound, Muffled belles around abound,
Hoop! Hoop! Hoop!
Hoops of whalebone, short and crisp, |
Hoop! Hoop! Hoop! What a vast, expansive hoop!
Jolly hoops, that wriggle round,
What gallant ships! What swelling sails!
Hoop! Hoop! Hoop! |
|
Copyright ©1998 by Virginia Mescher.
All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without permission. |